PCC framework is used for scoping reviews, where the aim is to map the breadth and nature of evidence on a topic, rather than synthesizing findings to assess effectiveness.
Example question: What evidence exists on digital health interventions for chronic disease self-management in low-income countries?
Criteria | Definitions | Inclusion example | Exclusion example |
Population | Group(s) of individuals, organizations, or entities that are the primary focus of the study | e.g. Adults with a diagnosed chronic condition such as diabetes or hypertension | e.g. Healthy populations not managing a chronic disease |
Concept | Key idea or subject matter, such as an intervention, exposure, experience, or outcome, being mapped or examined. | e.g. Digital tools used for chronic disease self-management support | e.g. Digital tools used solely for clinician-to-clinician communication |
Context | Setting, geographic location, or circumstances in which the concept is being examined | e.g. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) | e.g. High-income country settings only |
Other | Any additional information that affects a study's eligibility for your review or is helpful to consider during screening | e.g. Studies published from 2010 onwards | e.g. Studies reporting only on technology access without self-management outcomes |